|
Gear Making |
|
|
|
A bit of background on this one. I am planning to motorize
one of my telescopes. After trying to make some RC motor stuff work (a
planetary gear setup, but sadly, all plastic), I decided to try a stepper
motor. Well, I do know where to get them, and they are 3.6 degrees/step or
100 steps. One authority suggests that a 50:1 ratio would be good, which
would give about 360/5000, or about 0.72 degrees/step. The driving scheme
I’m thinking of would be about 18:1 on top of that, so I’d end up with about
0.004 degrees/step. That’s 15 arc seconds, roughly, per step.
Now since I’d need a 50:1 gearbox, I’d need either a 10
tooth and a 500 tooth gear, or a 20, 40, 20, 50, 20, 50…. Forget it! I’d
probably be happier buying one. Also, I don’t have the indexing head, quite,
for doing gears.
|
 |
Now there’s a technique for
making worm gears called hobbing. You need a blank of metal, and a tool that
has a section of worm gear shaft that has been made into a cutting tool. So
you thread a rod, then grind flutes in it for cutting teeth, then harden and
temper it.
I kept thinking of the shape of the tool, and it came to me that I
already had several of them around. They’re called taps. Now I know
that I would be supporting this at one end only, but I decided to give it a
try to see what would happen.
|
|
There’s someone who had a very nice description of how to
make gears and how to hob them. He’s much more precise than I, and I give
him full credit, Chris Heapy at
http://easyweb.easynet.co.uk/~chrish/worms.htm
I made a small shaft out of a piece of aluminum, then put a
nylon washer on it. The material you see for the gear blank is simply a
piece of 1 1/4 inch aluminum rod that was cut to 1/4 inch thick, and had a
center hole bored in it.
|
 |
The tap is brought up to just
touch the blank, which can spin freely, and the table is locked in place.
The mill is turned on, but at the slowest setting. As the tap spins, it
slices the aluminum, and turns the blank to the next position. I recommend
tap-free or the equivalent. As you can see, this cuts teeth quite well.
I’d keep the mill at low speed, and brush off chips frequently. The teeth
here are probably cut too deep, but it did work. If you look very carefully,
you’ll see that the cut is a trifle off center. This can be adjusted early
on, but I was looking for a proof of concept.
|
 |
The single point suspension is
not a major problem so far, although I haven’t bothered to make any kind of
precision measurement on the gear.
I do recommend that the size of the tap be exactly what you want for the
worm drive.
|
|
To that end, I’d suggest threaded rod and cutting down the
ends to make the rest of the worm gear. You can always cut your own, but
you’d want to be fairly precise with the worm gear diameter. The driven gear
is now easy to make. For 20 tpi brass rod, and a 1 inch diameter gear blank,
I calculate that you’d get a ratio of roughly 150 to 1. Not bad at all.
|
| I’ll
try a gearbox with this and a stepper motor. I’ll have a 1/4 inch output
shaft, which means that the gear will be held on with a setscrew. Those are
easy to do, I think. I’ll turn down the outside below the rim of the gear,
say to about 5/8 or so. I want about 1/4 inch minimum for the threads on the
setscrew.
I then center bore for the shaft. The shaft end would be faced at this
point, too. Without finishing the gear further, I’d remove it from the lathe
and use the power hacksaw to cut it off from the rod, about 1/8 inch over.
Next, I’d cut the teeth. Then when placing the gear small end in the
lathe, I’d face the large end of the gear to match the shaft and be
symmetrical. I have a little room to play with, here.
I’d probably place the gear in a gearbox milled from 1 by 1 1/2 by 1/2
aluminum, with the motor mounted on a plate at the small end. Of course,
that’s just off the top of my head, so the design is up for change. If I had
enough small bearings, I’d put ball bearings at least on the end of the worm
gear and at both ends of the driven gear.
I’d intend for this to be able to support a bit of weight, so the gearbox
would have to be rather sturdy. It does support 1/3 (sort of ) of the
telescope’s weight when used for azimuth drive. A similar gearbox would
drive the elevation system.
I’m not too worried about accuracy, because I intend for this to be in a
closed loop servo system.
|